home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca!sckettle
- From: sckettle@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (Steve Kettle)
- Subject: const objects
- Sender: news@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (news spool owner)
- Message-ID: <Dp99A8.4zq@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 22:03:44 GMT
- Nntp-Posting-Host: noether.math.uwaterloo.ca
- Organization: University of Waterloo
-
- Does anyone know the exact rule for when a const object may be placed in
- readonly memory - I thought a const object of a class which has no
- constructors and destructors could be placed in readonly memory but may be
- mistaken.
-
- Does anyone know the exact rule for possible placement in read only
- memory. And what does it mean for a class to have no constructors or
- destructors? What about compiler generated ones?
-
-
- Thanks
- Steve.
- --
-